News and Events
It’s not official unless there’s cake.
On the cusp of arXiv’s move to Computing and Information Science (CIS) in January, members of Cornell University Library and CIS celebrated 17 years of the scientific research repository’s growth under library stewardship, and to wish it continued success.
Carl A. Kroch University Librarian Gerald R. Beasley, arXiv program director Oya Rieger and CIS Dean Greg Morrisett spoke at a gathering Dec. 7 in the Physical Sciences Building.
“During this two-hour celebration, almost 40,000 [articles] will be downloaded by individuals from education and business organizations, from almost every country,” Rieger said in her remarks.
She touted the international prominence of arXiv, which has 1.5 million papers published to date, more than a billion downloads, an average of 600 articles submitted daily and 70 percent of its submissions coming from outside the United States.
Rieger also thanked arXiv founder Paul Ginsparg, the Cornell University Library community, her arXiv staff, volunteer moderators and open-science partners and funders, including the Simons Foundation and 230 libraries from 26 countries.
Beasley, who described the celebration as bittersweet, said the move to CIS would allow for the “most sustainable and brightest future for arXiv.”
“I’m really happy we got this solution in our hands,” he said. “We’ve been the proud steward of arXiv for 17 years ever since its founder brought it to Cornell …. In 2001, it was already big, but it was not as big as it would become.”
Beasley thanked and congratulated library staff involved in arXiv and addressed representatives from CIS: “We hope to be your best friends and closest neighbors.”
Morrisett read remarks by Ginsparg, who was unable to attend. Ginsparg, a professor of physics, wrote about arXiv’s history with the library and summarized the reasons for the transition.
“The move to CIS is natural due to the enormous growth in usage by the computer science community at large – specifically its adoption by the machine-learning community as a dissemination venue of choice – and to take better advantage of the research-related and technical resources available in CIS,” Ginsparg wrote. “We’re starting from a high bar and planning to give it our best shot.”
Morrisett said: “I’m excited about arXiv, what it represents in terms of open science and communities of scholars, what it’s already accomplished and where it’s going.”
He also underscored the need for long-term funding and shared initial plans.
“What I hope to do is set up something called ‘arXiv Labs’ that will focus on researching and developing new technologies and tools to help the community of scholars,” he said, adding that these will include classification algorithms for content moderation, systems that recommend relevant articles for researchers, and translation and summarizing tools.
“We are going to do our best to not only keep the rocket running,” Morrisett said, “but to also scale and push arXiv into its next orbit.” he said.
This story also appeared in the Cornell Chronicle.
Two minutes into Jason Schmitt’s documentary Paywall: The Business of Scholarship, a pop-up window flashed across the screen, demanding payment. At the free Nov. 29 screening at Cornell Cinema, the gag coaxed uneasy laughs from students, professors and scholars all too familiar with running into paywalls during their research. The screening was followed by a discussion.
Academic publishing is a $25 billion-a-year industry dominated by a handful of publishers with unfair business practices, the documentary claimed. Through interviews, it discussed issues of equity, access and public impact at the core of the paywall debate.
Paywall featured a range of commentators, including Frank Stasio, National Public Radio correspondent. “A lot of academic research was paid for with public funding, but public access is often restricted by expensive paywalls,” he observed.
Paul Ginsparg, Cornell physics professor and founder of open-access repository arXiv, explained that access to information is an advantage often held by the elite: “If you have some wonderful idea or you make some breakthrough, you like to think it’s because you had some inspiration or you worked harder than anyone else, but you don’t like to think it was because you had privileged access to information.”
Disparities in access bar all researchers from contributing innovation, and, for fields like medicine, up-to-date information can also mean the difference between life and death, said Ahmed Ogunlaja, a physician in Nigeria: “A lot of people are suffering as a result of the current system in academia. We have a lot of doctors who would benefit from having the latest information about what the best care [is] to give to their patients. There is so much research that has been done already.”
But there’s hope, according to the documentary: The international open access movement is a growing alternative, in which all readers get free access to digital articles and publishers only charge fees from authors for their submissions.
“In its simplest form, open access is free and unencumbered access to information. Very simply, it’s a way to democratize information. It’s to reduce disparity and to promote equality,” said Amy Brand, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press director.
At the post-screening panel discussion, topics included building open-access communities, addressing budgetary pressures on universities and libraries, and re-examining the academic tenure process that favors publication in closed venues run by large for-profit companies. The panel included the filmmaker, a professor of communication and media at Clarkson University; Gerald R. Beasley, the Carl A. Kroch University Librarian; and representatives from the University Faculty Library Board: Jeremy Braddock, associate professor of English; Paul Fleming, professor of comparative literature and German studies; and Max Zhang, associate professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering.
Audience member Abby Cohn, professor of linguistics, voiced a clarification about “fair open access” against a loose definition of open access: “Elsevier and all these other publishers are now letting people publish ‘open access’ papers with expensive author publication fees, but that’s just shifting the problem [to authors], so I think we need to be really careful about this.”
She offered advice to peers: “There is something that each of us as a scholar or author can do today … . We can grant rights to publish the material without giving away the copyrights.”
Prompted by questions from students, Beasley said libraries can continue to play a vital role in supporting, promoting and featuring open access platforms and journals.
“Libraries will do their bit,” he said, while also emphasizing the need for a concerted effort: “It’s going to be the faculty, it’s going to be the grad students, it’s going to be the other people who are asking for it and placing articles and demanding venues for their scholarship.”
Philanthropic foundations and research organizations can also make a tremendous difference in driving open access, said Schmitt. He mentioned the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation’s open access policy and also pointed to a plan by a European association of researchers and funders to publish their work in open-access channels by 2020.
Schmitt is optimistic that the United States will follow suit. “California recently is the first state in the U.S. to adopt an open-access plan for anything that’s funded through the state of California,” he said. “New York should be the second state to do that.”
This story also appeared in the Cornell Chronicle.